We use cookies - they help us provide you with a better online experience.
By using our website you accept that we may store and access cookies on your device.

previous 2/4 next 4/4 
The weather was pretty good, and a crowd of 37326 had shown up at Highbury for the match. was the appointed referee with assistance provided by and . A 3-5-2 alignment was the formation of choice for Silva+10. The following players took the field: Ezrak - Jochems, Rosário, Chkadua - Lefebvre, Sjoukema, Kindelán, Elekes, Delaunay - Westerstrand, de Souza.

scootertechno decided to use a 4-4-2 set up. Starters: Denzler - Havasi, Zabos, Demjén, Holló - Andrási, Zsilák, Semsei, Fekete - Fodor, Facskó.

Silva+10 were clearly looking ahead to the next match rather than focusing on the one at hand. It was an obvious ambition of Silva+10 to use their titanic ability at attacking on the flanks. Silva+10 had a good opportunity to attack in the middle, but remembered their instructions to focus on wing attacks instead. Silva+10 broke through on the left 8 minutes into the game, with Tim de Souza firing in from an acute angle to give the home side a 1 - 0 lead. With 15 minutes played, seemingly due to lack of experience, Nemo Jochems needlessly tripped an opponent just outside the penalty area, but the free kick that followed didn't succeed. Silva+10 put themselves up 2 - 0 when Alejandro Kindelán broke through on the right, leaving the entire defence trailing in his wake. Confident in their lead, Silva+10's players relaxed and focused more on defending the lead than increasing it. After 31 minutes, the away team failed to deal with a good exchange of passes on the right, and Alejandro Kindelán gave the Silva+10 supporters even more to cheer about when he increased the lead to 3 - 0. After 33 minutes Silva+10's Jean-Philippe Delaunay limped slightly after a late challenge, but he was able to continue. It was obvious that Silva+10 had instructions to attack on the wings instead of in the middle. Silva+10 increased the lead as Tim de Souza struck to make the score 4 - 0 after an attack from the left left him unmarked in front of the keeper. 4 - 0 was the halftime score. Silva+10 enjoyed most of the ball, as they maintained 76 percent of possession.

The referee showed Silva+10's Tristan Chkadua the yellow card after a particularly nasty challenge. scootertechno were forced into a substitution as Zalán Semsei couldn't continue due to some rough treatment, forcing József Ledzényi to come in off the bench. Silva+10's Jean-Philippe Delaunay increased the lead to 5 - 0, after he saw his shot go between the legs of the advancing goalkeeper following some good play down the right wing after 70 minutes. Silva+10's Tim de Souza left the field after 71 minutes because of a nasty blow to the shin. His replacement was Babou Thiombane. Joel Westerstrand had a fantastic opportunity to put Silva+10 up another goal 77 minutes into the match after a pass through the middle set him free, but he fired just over the crossbar. Joel Westerstrand hit the corner kick straight to the keeper, but it was mishandled, giving Silva+10's Tristan Chkadua an easy chance to knock it in for 6 - 0. Attacking on the wings was the choice for Silva+10, and they were successfully passing the ball from the middle to the wings to attack. Joel Westerstrand increased the lead for Silva+10 to 7 - 0, getting a head onto a hooked ball from the right. The ball looked to have taken a deflection on the way in, but he's claiming it! Possession in this half belonged to Silva+10, who controlled the ball 78 percent of the time.

Csongor Elekes performed admirably for Silva+10. Babou Thiombane turned in a dismal performance, however. scootertechno's best player was Sándor Facskó. Alexander Denzler was a disappointment, however. The match ends 7 - 0.

Rating details

Midfield inadequate (high) wretched (low) 19 6 5/20 2/20
Right defence outstanding (low) poor (very high) 38 12 10/20 3/20
Central defence formidable (very low) poor (very high) 33 12 9/20 3/20
Left defence brilliant (very low) poor (low) 41 10 11/20 3/20
Right attack solid (very high) wretched (high) 28 7 7/20 2/20
Central attack passable (very low) wretched (low) 21 6 6/20 2/20
Left attack excellent (very high) poor (very low) 32 9 8/20 3/20
 
Indirect set pieces
Defence passable (high) poor (very low) 23 9 6/20 3/20
Attack inadequate (low) poor (low) 18 10 5/20 3/20
 
Team attitude (Hidden) (Hidden)
Tactic Attack on wings Normal
Tactic skill titanic (no tactic) 15 (no tactic) 15/20
 

Possession

76%
24%
78%
22%

Chance distribution

Home Away
10 1

2 Left attack 0
3 Central attack 0
4 Right attack 0
0 Other 0
1 Special events 1
Detailed match analysis is not available for matches more than two seasons old.

Rating details

Please note that the percentages above are meant to guide you, but they do not equate to the exact probabilities (to score for example) used in the match engine.

Indirect set pieces

Defence passable (high) poor (very low) 23 9 6/20 3/20
Attack inadequate (low) poor (low) 18 10 5/20 3/20

Miscellaneous

Team attitude (Hidden) (Hidden)
Tactic Attack on wings Normal
Tactic skill titanic (no tactic) 15 (no tactic) 15/20

Average ratings

Total player experience inadequate (very high) poor (very low) 20 9 5/20 3/20
Average midfield inadequate (high) wretched (low) 19 6 5/20 2/20
Average defence outstanding (very low) poor (very high) 37 12 10/20 3/20
Average attack solid (high) wretched (high) 27 7 7/20 2/20
Total average solid (very high) wretched (very high) 28 8 7/20 3/20

Lineup




 
 
Rate this page
Server 094